An individual's degree of
resistance to change is determined by whether they perceive the change as good
or bad, and how severe they expect the impact of the change to be on them. Their
ultimate acceptance of the change is a function of how much resistance the
person has and the quality of their coping skills and their support system.
Your job as a leader is to
address their resistance from both ends to help the individual reduce it to a
minimal, manageable level. Your job is not to bulldoze their resistance so you
can move ahead.
Perception Does Matter
If you move an employee's desk six inches, they may not notice or care. Yet if
the reason you moved it those six inches was to fit in another worker in an
adjacent desk, there may be high resistance to the change. It depends on whether
the original employee feels the hiring of an additional employee is a threat to
his job, or perceives the hiring as bringing in some needed assistance.
-
A promotion is usually considered a good change. However an
employee who doubts their ability to handle the new job may strongly resist
the promotion. They will give you all kinds of reasons for not wanting the
promotion, just not the real one.
-
You might expect a higher-level employee to be less
concerned about being laid off, because they have savings and investments to
support them during a job search. However, the individual may feel they are
over extended and that a job search will be long and complicated. Conversely,
your concern for a low-income employee being laid off may be unfounded if they
have stashed a nest egg in anticipation of the cut.
-
Your best salesperson may balk at taking on new, high
potential account because they have an irrational feeling that they don't
dress well enough.
If you try and bulldoze
this resistance, you will fail. The employee whose desk you had to move will
develop production problems. The top worker who keeps declining the promotion
may quit rather than have to continue making up excuses for turning you down.
And the top salesperson's sales may drop to the point that you stop considering
them for the new account. Instead, you overcome the resistance by defining the
change and by getting mutual understanding.
Definition
On the front end, you need to define the change for the employee in as much
detail and as early as you can. Provide updates as things develop and become
more clear. In the case of the desk that has to be moved, tell the employee
what's going on. "We need to bring in more workers. Our sales have increased by
40% and we can't meet that demand, even with lots of overtime. To make room for
them, we'll have to rearrange things a little." You could even ask the employees
how they think the space should be rearranged. You don't have to accept their
suggestions, but it's a start toward understanding.
Definition is a two-way
street. In addition to defining the problem, you need to get the employees to
define the reasons behind their resistance.
Understanding
Understanding is also a two-way street. You want people to understand what is
changing and why. You also need to understand their reluctance.
-
You have to help your people understand. They want to know
what the change will be and when it will happen, but they also want to know
why. Why is it happening now? Why can't things stay like they have always
been? Why is it happening to me?
-
It is also important that they understand what is not
changing. Not only does this give them one less thing to stress about, it also
gives them an anchor, something to hold on to as they face the winds of
uncertainty and change.
-
You need to understand their specific fears. What are they
concerned about? How strongly do they feel about it? Do they perceive it as a
good or a bad thing?
Manage This Issue
Don't try to rationalize things. Don't waste time wishing people were more
predictable. Instead, focus on opening and maintaining clear channels of
communication with your employees so they understand what is coming and what it
means to them. They will appreciate you for it and will be more productive both
before and after the change.
F. John Reh
Source:
http://management.about.com/cs/people/a/
MngChng092302.htm